10216160_Windfarm_176127cSince around the end of the last century, and certainly within the first few years of the 21st century it seemed clear to me that the only game in town for the coming 25 years – and quite possibly for the next 50 years – would be energy; specifically, mankind’s insatiable appetite for energy, exacerbated by a declining trend in net energy.  In other words, mankind is finding it increasingly difficult to extract worthwhile energy returns on energy invested (or ERoEI as it’s known).  We have to do more and more work (ie expend more and more energy) to find, extract, process and use energy in the amounts and forms that we consume it.  Consequently, pretty much wherever you look these days the cost of energy is rising.  Incidentally, don’t be fooled by the shale gas/oil hype; we’ll address that one before we part company here.

A Looming Energy Crisis?

Energy’s one of those resources to which we tend not to pay too much attention unless it’s drawn to our notice.  We take for granted the omnipresent benefits of energy, from switching on our lights and heaters, to surfing the internet, watching television, drinking clean water and squirting liquid in to the car and driving it for another 500 miles.  Did you know for example that when you put 40 litres of fuel in your car, you’re putting in the equivalent of 4 years’ worth of human manual labour?  Such is the near-miraculous nature of oil.  Look at it another way.  The amount of energy that you need to live the life that you enjoy in your home today is equivalent to having 50 people (serfs and slaves in previous civilisations) in your cellar cycling furiously day and night to generate power.

Meanwhile, today Mr Alistair Buchanan the Chief Executive of the UK’s ‘Office of the Gas and Electricity Markets’ (OFGEM) told us that “Britain faces an unprecedented combination of the global financial crisis, tough environmental targets, increasing gas import dependency and the closure of ageing power stations” and that we need to “reform the energy market”.  If all we had to do was “reform the energy market” we could all, er, switch the lights off and go home now.

You wouldn’t necessarily know there was a looming energy problem if it weren’t for the likes of Mr Buchanan popping up from time to time to state as much.  Indeed, only last month Dr Tim Morgan (Tullett Prebon’s Global Head of Research) published a report entitled, “Perfect Storm: Energy, Finance and the End of Growth”.  On the matter of energy in particular, Dr Morgan made the point that “the economy is an energy dynamic, not a monetary construct [and that] the critical surplus energy component is now in rapid and seemingly irreversible decline”.  Dr Morgan observed that “policymakers [are] blinded both by short-termism and by a focus on the monetary token rather than the energy reality [and] have yet to recognise the real problem”.

Without wishing to put too fine a point on it mankind is at the leading edge of an energy crisis.

Energy – Just Another Resource?

Of course, the economics’ orthodoxy generally pooh-poohs any notion that energy is a special case in the functioning of the economy, still less that our demand for energy could become an existential crisis.  Economists assume that “needed resources will magically arise because the marketplace demands them[1]”.  Energy is just another resource and the market will provide.  The challenge right now, however, is that our complex society, our economy, our whole way of life in the ‘developed world’ and for much of the rest of mankind is predicated and, indeed, critically reliant upon perpetual economic growth.  Economic growth is, in the end, the fruit of human labour; the result of human beings doing work; and – as any physicist will tell you – energy is the ability to do work.

I’m a physicist by university education and so perhaps it’s not surprising that I’m interested in the connection between energy and economics, between energy and the workings of our complex society.  The physicist Dr Michio Kaku reminds us that “energy is vital to civilisation.  In fact all of human history can be viewed through the lens of energy[2]”.  Dr Kaku observes that “for 99.9% of human existence … the energy available to us was one-fifth of one horsepower – the power of our own muscles”.  It wasn’t until the agricultural revolution that mankind discovered how to harness the energy of beasts of burden; we learned how to generate surplus energy and the result was the founding of our first cities just a few thousand years ago.

It’s only been since the Industrial Revolution – when we discovered how to exploit 2 billion years’ worth of accumulated energy reserves – that we’ve been able to fuel (literally) an unprecedented explosion in wealth and population and, as it happens, debt.  Neoclassical economists generally assume that economic growth as we have come to know and love it over the past 200-odd years is some sort of eternal God-given right.  Take a look at virtually any report published recently by the mainstream economics bodies/institutes/foundations and they all tend to forecast a return to industrial age or near-industrial age rates of economic growth in the coming years.  Indeed, many of them have been predicting such a return to growth since shortly after the global financial system almost collapsed in 2007/08.  The predictions get revised every year and the return to the nirvana of economic growth gets pushed further to the right.  Indeed, the calls for a return to economic growth seem to me to be getting more and more desperate from all quarters these days.

Meantime, our economy languishes at the level of anaemia at best.  This absence of growth baffles the economics orthodoxy and the politicians who rely on them to formulate their policies – which usually involve spending ever-growing sums of money that they don’t have.  For those of us who view the economy as an energy construct, however, our present predicament is no surprise at all.

Economic Growth From Here 

On the other hand, perhaps it’s not surprising that economists have industrial age rates of economic growth hardwired in to their systems.  Economics as the discipline we know it today only really emerged along with the Industrial Revolution itself.  For millennia prior to the 19th century economic growth was pretty much flat, certainly less than 1.0% per year; economic wellbeing doubled every 3,000 to 4,000 years or so; life didn’t change much from one generation to the next.  However, from around 1820 onwards economic wellbeing doubled every 50 years or so, an astonishing acceleration in wealth creation.  Come the 20th century mankind increased its energy consumption by twelvefold over the previous century as we ramped up our exploitation of oil in particular.  Since the 1950s the trend rate of economic growth in the UK has been about 2.5% per year meaning that our wealth has been doubling in cycles of less than 30 years.  Does that strike you as sustainable, by the way, given the history of mankind up to 200 years ago?

Reports like those from OFGEM today, from Tullett Prebon last month and many more besides that never make the mainstream news are heralding the end of growth.  This notion of ‘the end of growth’ is absolute heresy to the economics community, partly explaining why reports of the end of growth rarely see the light of day.   Economists seem to be of the view that economic growth gives rise to a growth in energy products, and not the other way around.  This is a strange view in light of the causal connection between energy and the economy.

Shale Gas & Oil: We’re Saved – Aren’t We?

Fear not, I hear you say: shale gas and shale oil will save the day.  We can look forward to another 200 years of our wealth doubling very 30 – 50 years any day now.  Well, hold it right there.  Today the Post Carbon Institute published a report ‘Drill Baby Drill’ in which the abstract states:

“It’s now assumed that recent advances in fossil fuel production – particularly for shale gas and shale oil – herald a new age of energy abundance, even “energy independence,” for the United States.  Nevertheless, the most thorough public analysis to date of the production history and the economic, environmental, and geological constraints of these resources in North America shows that they will inevitably fall short of such expectations, for two main reasons: first, shale gas and shale oil wells have proven to deplete quickly, the best fields have already been tapped, and no major new field discoveries are expected; thus with average per-well productivity declining and ever-more wells (and fields) required simply to maintain production, an “exploration treadmill” limits the long-term potential of shale resources.  Second, although tar sands, deepwater oil, oil shales, coalbed methane, and other non-conventional fossil fuel resources exist in vast deposits, their exploitation continues to require such enormous expenditures of resources and logistical effort that rapid scaling up of production to market-transforming levels is all but impossible; the big ‘tanks’ of these resources are inherently constrained by small ‘taps’.”

Time for a New Economic Reality

As far as energy and the economy are concerned, reality is intruding with a vengeance these days.  Notwithstanding, and as Dr Morgan implies, the political class is busy legalising gay marriage (is this really a national priority?), ramping up the national debt and dreaming up ever more complex ways of taxing us to within an inch of our lives – on the fundamental assumption that economic growth will be restored any day now.  On that basis, if I may paraphrase the words of a famous astronaut for a moment, “Society, we have a problem”.  We’ll look at quite how we should be responding to our predicament in future posts, whilst all along taking great care to ignore the obsolete economics orthodoxy.

This article was also posted at the ‘Renegade Economist’ website:

Edit: thought this would help reinforce my post above …


[1].                                ‘The Crash Course’, Chris Martenson, Wiley, 2011.

[2].                                ‘Physics of the Impossible’, Dr Michio Kaku, Penguin Books, 2009.


  1. Hi MM,

    Just a quick post to congratulate you another very lucid comment. I like the blog, I read backwards through it this afternoon; which means working this evening to finish a job for a client.

    I do miss your comments on the DT Comments section; you and a couple of others seem to be the only ones who have any common sense and can put forward a point without resorting to insults. You are a beacon of sanity in a world of CIF trolls, swivel eyed nutjobs, and out and out crackpots.

    Anyway, keep up the good work I look forward to reading further blog posts from you.


    1. moraymint · ·

      Thanks for your comment Michael. I do post the odd comment on the DT (and I always now link back to here), but I did get fed up with being ‘moderated’. It seemed bizarre that I would often post a comment that was polite, factual, didn’t incite anybody to violence etc, etc … but within moments it would be taken down. I don’t do conspiracy theories, but I did wonder if at times I hit nerves which sent pain signals up to the DT’s editorial level? Goodness knows. Anyway, I much prefer getting things off my chest here where I don’t have to pander to anybody else’s editorial line! I’ve only had one troll visit me so far, but perhaps there will be more over time. I’m now getting thousands of hits from all over the world which is remarkable really, and from all sorts of sources. Anyway, glad to see you here and look forward to hearing from you in future … or you can just read … it’s your choice.

      PS The DT’s Jeremy Warner now follows me on Twitter which is interesting and I’m pleased that he does. He’s an excellent journalist, as is Ambrose E-P and a few other guys on the DT team. Notwithstanding my experience with the mods, I do find the DT to be an excellent source of news and analysis. The BBC is a lost cause. Pity we have no choice but to pay for it.


  2. Right now this minute I have ten dollars in my pocket. If that money runs out before a week from Friday then I am in a very bad spot. Our whole economy is able to run because we have so-called extra surplus oil. In fact we currently have about 2 million b/o a day surplus to maneuver in.

    We have reserves that can last about 55 days of oil usage before we run out. My own bank account has savings too that would enable me to survive about 60 days if I had to tap into it. Once demand runs up against the surplus we will then lead a hand to mouth existence. There will be NO wriggle room. There will be no growth.

    The world currently uses about 31.3 billion barrels a year of oil and no other resource even comes close to that amount of energy or the density of oil energy. When the media proclaims that Brazil “maybe” has found 15 billion barrels of oil eight miles off shore, four miles deep I just laugh. That’s not even enough for half a year.

    Thanks for your post. I learned a couple of other things about the oil situation.


  3. John Hatfield · ·

    In fact Moray, Swigert’s actual words were: ‘Okay, Houston, we’ve had a problem here.’

    Does that mean you have it wrong and we are suddenly going to find a previously unused source of energy? Being frivolous, but are the Chinese not pursuing research using another fissionable material, can’t remember its name, for nuclear energy? And nuclear fission?
    Perhaps one day.


    1. moraymint · ·

      Thanks for the correction John! As a scientist myself (by education anyway) I agree that ‘tomorrow’ could lift the curtain on a new and as yet unrecognised source of energy that had hitherto been unknown or not understood or misunderstood, or whatever. Never say never. However, the cold scientific facts suggest that, on the critical issue of mankind discovering, developing and rolling out worldwide a facsimile substitute for oil in particular, things don’t look too bright at all. You can get some idea about how I consider these things from my previous post “Who’s Moraymint”. Right now, it’s really quite difficult to see how mankind will resolve its looming energy predicament. Some commentators are already way more pessimistic and doom-mongering then ever I am (or will be). Stay in touch.


  4. Super summary of our predicament.

    I’d like to add that in conversations with well-intentioned people, I often hear the comment ‘if only we could throw resources at discovering a clean, cheap energy source’

    Clean ok. But cheap energy is no solution. We’ve had cheap energy for over a century and it has resulted in exponential population growth.

    If we are going to have clean and cheap energy then we will also need other sources of resources to feed the enormous populations this cheap energy will result in.

    What we need is a new economic system.

    Perhaps the Amish are a good model?


Economics from the Top Down

New ideas in economics and the social sciences

Derekbernard's Blog

Just another weblog

Great Debate

where disparate minds meet

Aisle C

I See This


“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. - J Robert Oppenheimer.

Chai et Rasade

The Vintage Wine Seller's Blog

Moraymint Chatter

A father's thoughts for his children ... and other stuff

Chauncey Tinker's Blog

Reversing "Western" decline with reason.

The Participator

A father's thoughts for his children ... and other stuff

The Worldview

Explaining our world in simple terms

The Brexit Door

Independent thinking for an Independent Britain

EU Referendum Blog

A father's thoughts for his children ... and other stuff

Surplus Energy Economics

The home of the SEEDS economic model - Tim Morgan


Matthew Scott's Legal Comment Argument and Discussion. Comment Awards 2015 Best Independent Blog

Our Finite World

Exploring how oil limits affect the economy

Independent Sovereign Democratic Britain

A father's thoughts for his children ... and other stuff

Sandy Paterson Mountaineering

A father's thoughts for his children ... and other stuff

Do the Math

A father's thoughts for his children ... and other stuff

The Archdruid Report

A father's thoughts for his children ... and other stuff

A father's thoughts for his children ... and other stuff

%d bloggers like this: